This system was to differ from adult or criminal court in a number of ways. It was to focus on the child or adolescent as a person in need of assistance, not on the act that brought him or her before the court. The proceedings were informal, with much discretion left to the juvenile court judge. Because the judge was to act in the best interests of the child, procedural safeguards available to adults, such as the right to an attorney, the right to know the charges brought against one, the right to trial by jury, and the right to confront one's accuser, were thought unnecessary.
Subscribe to NNS Daily: Simone Lewis-Turner, 16, asks Mark Mertens, director of the Milwaukee County Division of Youth and Family Services, about the role youth voice will have in pending juvenile justice reform. Over the last several years, the youth prisons have undergone criminal investigations and been subject to numerous lawsuits for allegations of abuse, neglect and excessive use of force.
Youth Justice Milwaukee YJMa community-based juvenile justice advocacy group, planned and hosted the meeting for Milwaukee residents to learn about and provide input on Act following similar meetings that the State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections hosted in Green Bay, Waukesha and Eau Claire throughout August.
Lena Taylor and State Rep. Photo by Allison Dikanovic What does Act do? Act will not necessarily change how youth are referred to services, but it will change what happens after a young person receives a correctional order and is placed in correctional facility.
This occurs when a court adjudicates a young person for an act that would be punishable by six months or more for an adult — a felony offense or a Class A misdemeanor. Today, the young person comes under DOC supervision, and the state provides services.
The facility will hold youth the state deems Serious Juvenile Offenders and youth who were tried as adults in court. In addition to the Type 1 facility, several counties will operate smaller Secure Residential Care Centers for young people who receive correctional orders but are not part of the Serious Juvenile Offenders program.
These facilities will give counties more autonomy in how they serve youth with correctional orders, while still being regulated by the state. Act also provides funding to expand the Mendota Juvenile Treatment Center, which will remain under the state Department of Health Services.
The size and location of the Type 1 facility has not been decided yet. The regulations for the secure centers are also yet to be determined. Act created two committees to plan how to make the changes.
It will make recommendations about the Type 1 facility on Nov. Seven of the 25 committee members are from Milwaukee, including Rep. Evan Goyke and Sen. The second committee is responsible for overseeing grant proposals from counties to fund the various secure centers.
The location, size and design of the Milwaukee County secure facility is still unknown, and Mertens said the county is considering different options, including renovating the Vel Phillips Juvenile Justice Center, building a new site or partnering with a local provider that is already providing residential care.
According to Mertens, the Milwaukee County secure center will not use pepper spray, chemical agents or punitive isolation to control or discipline youth.
In order to meet the March grant deadline, the county has formed working groups around facilities, budget, programming, community and the grant.
It is also working with consultants from Seattle and the Annie E. Community input Following the presentation, representatives from Youth Justice Milwaukee facilitated small group discussions about a set of questions created by the DOC.
Both state and county officials encouraged community members to continue providing input after the meeting. Attendees offered ideas for reforms including more re-entry support, better job training, increased transparency about processes, adequate and accessible mental healthcare, accountability surveys for staff, arts programs, partnerships with schools and increased empathy among staff.
Dunn suggested that every young person should have access to a therapist and adults they can confide in, depend on and look up to. Other attendees mentioned wanting the facility to be accessible by at least three bus lines so family members can visit, and a more representative racial and ethnic makeup of staff members.
Simone Lewis-Turner, a year-old junior at Milwaukee High School of the Arts, said she wants youth voices to be heard in the decision-making. Juvenile Justice System Carlos M. Lino Rios University of Phoenix CJA/ - INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINAL JUSTICE March 18, David Kurylowicz, MBA Juvenile Justice System There is a rationale in society that juveniles are still in development state and their Behavior can be malleable.
This chart outlines the different philosophies and procedures in the juvenile justice system compared to the adult criminal justice system. Almost every state has legislative provisions for trying.
The chair of the House of Corrections Committee, Rep. James Johnson of New Castle and Wilmington, has been a proponent of juvenile justice reform.
Dec 19, · This is not just a Maryland problem, and it is not new. Girls have been treated unequally in the juvenile justice system for generations, whether because of sexist notions about appropriate behavior or the greater attention that has been focused on rehabilitation for boys.
Student Strives to Make a Difference in the Criminal Justice System Jim Johns chose to earn his bachelor’s degree in a field he is passionate about. Several years ago, he was assisting GED instructors in jails and halfway houses as a favor to a friend.
The classical conservative approach to juvenile justice is ___. The traditional liberal approach to juvenile justice stresses __.
"get tough on juveniles" - to punish them. treatment and rehabilitation, including community-based programs.